On Tuesday 28 August 2007 1:35:20 pm Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 28.08.2007 05:57, Karsten Wade wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 15:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> So if you are a EPEL contributor: what do you want? Do you want to elect > >> a EPEL Steering Committee? Do you want a bigger or a smaller one? Do you > >> want to get rid of it? > > > > I'll let my man Chuck D > > /me had to visit wikipedia at this point > > > speak for me: > > "Power to the people with no delay." > > > > Fedora is evolving, and where? Steering committees don't seem fit the > > need like they did before. > > Agreed, but now and then they (or something like a Steering Committee) > are still needed afaics. Especially in EPEL we need some group to send a > "This is the direction" signal, as some people want a "Stable EPEL, with > a update style similar t othe one from RHEL" while others want a "Extras > like, always rolling, always new and shiny" style. Mixing the two models > would afaics the worst, so someone needs to pick the site, even if some > people feel pissed of. right now you get extras type rolling release by enabling testing and stable by not. both are covered just fine :) at least this is my take on it Dennis -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
