On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 10:26 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > > On 8/28/07, Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 22:13 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > > > Is gjdoc going to be made available for F-7, or am I stuck with > the > > > javadoc that is missing support for annotations? Thanks, > > > > During F7 development we removed gjdoc in favour of sinjdoc for > various > > reasons (basically dead upstream, didn't support 1.5 features). If > > you'd like, you could resurrect gjdoc for F7. > > I see. In that case, it's probably better to add annotation support > to sinjdoc. I'll contact upstream and see if somebody is working on > that; if not, I'll have a look at what needs to be done. Note that this will not matter for x86 and x86_64 for F8 with the inclusion of IcedTea and will hopefully not matter much longer than F8 for ppc and other platforms. Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
