On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 11:45:16PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Sa August 25 2007, Matt Domsch wrote: > > > Subject: Fedora i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2007-08-25 > > > Note: all built using rawhide as of Monday, August 19; changes to > > rawhide since then are not reflected below. > > Imho there would be less confusion, when you use the date when you started the > rebuild in the subject instead of the date when it finished. I can think about doing this. > Or maybe rebuild > all packages, that failed to build, when they have a more recent version > available. Maybe this can reduce the gap between the starting and finishing > the rebuild good enough. I did a fresh complete rebuild from last Monday's rawhide to be sure everything got rebuilt with the new buildid code path. However, even on 7 fast builders, it takes several days to build 4660 packages * 2 architectures. I believe all the toolchain changes are now complete, such that I can just do rebuilds of failed builds for the rest of the Fedora 8 cycle. That takes less than a day, it's only a little over 600 packages at this point. I would like to see Fedora implement a hard deadline, such as Test 1, for all toolchain changes to be complete, so that all builds that happen post-Test1 will be built with the new toolchain. I know that's been the goal of releng, but I'd like to see that formalized as well. Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
