On 8/23/07, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 18:02 -0400, Jon Nettleton wrote: > > On 8/22/07, Douglas McClendon <dmc.fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > In general, it sounds like you are outlining several different > > > problem/solutions, but I don't think they all need to be as tightly > > > integrated as you suggest. > > > > > > For instance, the gdm in initramfs (or very very early). Why do you > > > need this copy-on-write rootfs stuff? Why not just have a tmpfs, and a > > > gdm configuration that looks there. Likewise for the early logging > > > stuff. Later during boot, the early-boot logfiles in tmpfs can be > > > copied to /var/log. This isn't as nice as the magic > > > unionfs/dm-snapshot-merge automagic merging. But I don't think that is > > > necessary and worth the steps you are taking to get it. > > > > The problem is that all the X gdm talk is through fifo sockets. This > > busies the filesystems > > and makes it impossible to just copy things around. If we want the > > boot process to be > > smooth and seamless we are going to need some sort of ability to write > > to a "read only" filesystem in place. > > Why not just put the fifo on a tmpfs, and keep it around for the life of > the system. Being tmpfs, it cleans up nicely when shut down. There are > many other reasons to move the X socket from /tmp (selinux etc). > > Would a permanent symlink from /tmp -> a tmpfs mounted on /var/run/X > solve the legacy issues? > That only leaves some log issues. However if other people have no problems with /var/run/X and /var/run/gdm being tmpfs or ramfs then this is do-able. Jon -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
