On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:20:10PM +0200, rafalzaq wrote: > Cssed is under GPLv2+, but some part of code is under this license > http://scintilla.sourceforge.net/License.txt : > "License for Scintilla and SciTE > > Copyright 1998-2003 by Neil Hodgson <neilh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > All Rights Reserved > > Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its > documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, > provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that > both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in > supporting documentation. > > NEIL HODGSON DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS > SOFTWARE, INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY > AND FITNESS, IN NO EVENT SHALL NEIL HODGSON BE LIABLE FOR ANY > SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES > WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, > WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER > TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE > OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. " > > What should I use in the License tag? Looks like MIT, so the license is GPLv2+ since GPLv2+ causes the resulting binary to be covered by GPLv2+. You may add a comment in the spec file stating which source files are covered by the MIT license but it isn't an obligation. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
