On 8/22/07, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 08:52 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > Even if the Spin Public License is acceptable I don't think we could > > include the available codebase as is. What we really really need, is > > an upstream release that is already self-consistently licensed with > > the spin public license. The tarball I found was not. > > Yes. First, we need this, then we'll review the license used. > > Note that the following will prevent it a license from being OK for > Fedora: > > * Use restrictions > * Commercial restrictions > * Modification restrictions Thanks for the information. I'll talk to upstream and see what can be done. -- Jerry James http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
