On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 23:32 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Looks a lot like MIT to me. So "GPLv2+ and MIT"? > > > > It is MIT (new style), but unless that c file gets build into a binary > all by > itself, the resulting binaries are all GPLv2+ (as thats the more > restrective > license of their input files. And this the license tag is simple: > License: GPLv2+ This is correct. :) ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
