On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:11:21AM +0200, Zoltan Kota wrote: > I'm updating the License tag in the spec file of my packages. > > Checking the source files of 'recode' I found the following licenses: > mostly GPLv2+, LGPLv2+, and in some files GNU Library General Public > License. > According to gnu.org the GNU Library General Public License has been > succeeded by the GNU Lesser General Public License. > > What should I use in the License tag?? GNU Lesser General Public License is a name of the license that was introduced for LGPL2.1, before that (e.g. LGPL2) it was called GNU Library General Public License. I think in License: we aren't supposed to differentiate between LGPL2 and LGPL2.1, so both licenses are to be tagged with LGPLv2 resp. LGPLv2+, depending on if they allow any later version or not. Jakub -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
