On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Dan Horák wrote: > Ville Skyttä píše v Út 21. 08. 2007 v 18:51 +0300: > > On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Dan Horák wrote: > > > should the output from "make clog" in package's repo contain the first > > > line with "date name EVR"? I think it is not necessary as the commit > > > message. > > > > I find especially the EVR useful when looking at "cvs log" output and > > ViewCVS. > > But the EVR is easy to find in the tags. When a file contains tens of tags and a long change history, having to scroll back and forth to map the tag names to revisions and log entries isn't fun at all. While perhaps relatively easy, it's certainly much harder than just looking at the log entry and seeing all relevant info right there. > Removing a line for is easier for me then adding one for you. I'm not sure if I parse that correctly, but I don't see what actual problems the one line (which is already there) causes, whereas two cases by two contributors have already been presented that would be negatively affected by its removal. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
