On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 05:51:16PM +0200, kwizart wrote: > > * STLport - http://www.stlport.org/doc/license.html > This is a optional build dependency of OpenCASCADE which will make > OpenCASCADE built "not supported" by the development team. Normally (and unless I am wrong, I am not very knowledgable about C++) STLport shouldn't be needed on fedora, since the native templates are enough. Wouldn't hurt to have STPport in fedora though. It is in Dries, and I succesfully used Dries spec file on fedora devel some time ago. > * omniORB -* *http://omniorb.sourceforge.net/ - Seems to be GPL That seems right. > * scilab - http://www.scilab.org - Scilab (c)INRIA-ENPC > Their own license seems too restrictive - probably not acceptable. Not acceptable, since modified versions cannot be sold. > * z88 - http://www.z88.uni-bayreuth.de - claims to be GPL but it > needs openmotif which is not free software (lesstif cannot be used) I don't know how this could be handled, but it could be in EPEL, maybe like OLPC only packages. > But what about an optional BR ? Maybe coordinate with other repos, that is avoid packaging it in fedora if it may be in another repo where the BR is possible. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
