Jesse Keating wrote: > A less technical but a nonetheless important rebuild issue is > correct package licensing. We have a goal to have all our packages > with (a) correct License(s) tag in the spec file, and a build with > that correct tag. I do not have the numbers currently as to how > many still need updating, it is not a small number. As of yesterday afternoon, it was 3148 out of 4667 (~67%). I posted a full listing to fedora-legal-list here[1]: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-August/msg00032.html The list is based on what's in CVS, not what's been built. (It's also lower by 40 since I posted that.) [1] If anyone can give me some pointers on getting a mapping of packages <-> maintainers from the new packagedb, that'd be much appreciated. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When you make a mistake, make amends immediately. It's easier to eat crow while it's still warm.
Attachment:
pgpqE8QXXrAAJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
