On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 16:16 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:54:05AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > > > Is that the only license for Lesstif? > > No, there are LGPLv2+, MIT and GPLv2+ parts. > > > Strictly speaking, this isn't a license. This is copyright assignment > > with no restrictions. > > > > I haven't added it to the table yet, because so far, nothing has been > > wholly under this "license". It's not worth listing until we hit a case > > where this is the only "license" for a package. > > I thought than when there are multiple licenses all must be listed with > and: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-5dcaa7704b32aabaddc2e709f328f48eea6c91de Yes. Except for this. You don't have to list "no license". ;) ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
