Re: reducing power usage of Fedora - how you can help!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/08/07, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 4) Report the results. You can add reports here, on #fedora-devel,
>    or to the upstream powertop community at power@xxxxxxxxxxx or
>    #powertop on irc.oftc.net.
>

On one of my machines:

Top causes for wakeups:
  83.7% (912.8)       <interrupt> : extra timer interrupt
   9.2% (100.0)       S06cpuspeed : queue_delayed_work_on
(delayed_work_timer_fn)
   2.8% ( 30.0)   fail2ban-server : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
   1.7% ( 18.0)   at-spi-registry : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)
   0.9% ( 10.0)              Xorg : do_setitimer (it_real_fn)
   0.3% (  3.0)        imap-login : schedule_timeout (process_timeout)

The fail2ban-server is an ongoing mystery (BZ #251580), but the one
that jumps out as previously unreported is the at-spi entry. Is that
anomalous and worth reporting upstream?

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux