On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 01:25:35PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: > Hi all, > > The new packages contain updated xpdf-3.02 from upstream to fix CVE-2007-3387, Seems to me that it would be better to keep xpdf separate for texlive. > The new texmf packages contain packaging fixes, it obsoletes tetex-eurofont and > tetex-tex4ht as it's now part of TeXLive. We can add tetex-eurofont and tetex-tex4ht > maintainers to comaintainer list so that they can maintain it in TeXLive if they I am the tetex-tex4ht maintainer, and as it is updated regularly I am not sure that it is a good idea to have it in texlive. Moreover it is already a complicated package by itself, especially if you want to be able to build from the literate sources. I am not definitively against maintaining it within texlive, but it isn't obvious to me that it is the best way. I haven't have a look at texlive already, though. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
