On Friday 10 August 2007, Till Maas wrote: > On Fr August 10 2007, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 02:23:00PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FullExceptionList > > > "These are the packages you can safely assume will be present in a > > > BuildRoot without being pulled in by a package's BuildRequires." > > > > > > python is included in that list, so it seems that the minimal buildroot > > > configs need fixing. > > > > Or python removed from the list? > > It seems the list needs a lot more adjustment, Yep, that's very likely. > this is a diff between the > list on the wiki and the packages installed in a i386 mock build without > BuildRequires (according to the var/log/yum.log in the chroot directory): At least some of those are because rpmdevtools appears to be installed in the mock buildroot. I'm not sure why it is (maybe due to check-buildroot checks (which have moved to rpm-build in Rawhide)?), but as long as it is not explicitly listed, people shouldn't assume it or the extra things it pulls in is always there. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
