Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:32:30 -0500 > Dan Yocum <yocum@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> It's stable, widely tested, widely deployed, and >> it's being actively developed and maintained (which is more than can >> be said of some other filesystems that remain in the default list). >> It's in the kernel, it shouldn't be "hidden" in the depths of >> anaconda anymore. > > How's the SELinux support these days? And why can't I boot from xfs > yet? Not addressing either of these questions directly, but with regard to overall quality of xfs in F8... I ran the xfsqa test suite on 2.6.23-0.71.rc2.fc8 over the weekend. Of the "auto" test group (those expected to pass reliably), 90 of 93 tests passed (this after fixing a quota bug I found & fixed over the weekend). Of the 3 failures, 2 are "harmless" - i.e. no data corruption, security issues, or anything like that - one is a bleeding-edge allocator feature not working quite 100%, another has to do with slightly different log traffic pattern due to a recent change w.r.t. the expected output. The "real" failure has to do with mmap writes into preallocated space; I'll look into that as I have time. just FYI, -Eric -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
