What about the Standard ML of New Jersey License (SMLNJL)? Is this just
another instance of MIT?
I'm asking because MLton has bits and pieces under different licenses:
package license use
-------------- ------------------------------ ------------
MLton MLton-LICENSE (BSD-style)
SML/NJ NJ-LICENSE (BSD-style) front-end mllex
specification
front-end mlyacc
specification
precedence parser
CM lexer and parser
OS.IO, Posix.IO,
Process, Unix
mllex
mlyacc and MLYacc Library
Concurrent ML Library
CKit Library
mlnlffigen and MLNLFFI
Library
MLRISC Library
SML/NJ Lib SMLNJ-LIB-LICENSE (BSD-style) SML/NJ Library
ML Kit MLKit-LICENSE (MIT) Path, Time, Date
gdtoa gdtoa-LICENSE (BSD-style) Real binary <-> decimal
conversions
gmp gmp-LICENSE (LGPL) IntInf
It would be nice if I could just say "MIT" and be done with it.
(gmp is not actually shipped with MLton)
Adam
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Did I tell you to use the CMU license for a package? Did you come to the
> conclusion that the CMU license was what you had?
>
> I was wrong. Forgive me.
>
> If you've got a package with:
>
> License: CMU
>
> change it to:
>
> License: MIT
>
> All apologies for the confusion, I promise, I won't change it again. :)
>
> ~spot
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
