On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 10:31 -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 14:52 +0200, Florian Festi wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > The next generation of yum can be found at http://www.yum4.org > > > And for those who want the future right now: http://www.yum5.org. > > > > > > If you think the content is too boring try using whois. > > > > > > > Florian, > > That is hilarious. Thanks for pointing that out. > > > > I was thinking from here on out we should just do squares for version > > number increases: > > > > yum 3 -> yum 9 -> yum 81 -> yum 6561 -> yum 43046721 -> yum > > 1853020188851841 > > Why not using the (La)TeX idea of an irrational number, adding a digit > each round? sqrt(11) = 3.316624... would do. So the next one would be > 3.3, then 3.31, 3.316, ... > > [Sadly, the "nice" numbers \pi, e, \phi are too small now...] Use resonant frequencies of your favorite isotopes - you get the benefit of higher version numbers and multiple choices for each release :P Yeah, I'm just being silly, catching up on old email. Jon. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
