On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:55:48 -0500 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And I am more and more starting to think this might be a _good_ idea. > Users that want modules we aren't willing to carry upstream can > install the dkms "payload" (as you described it) for the module, > build and install. > > Some might think this is too technical a hurdle for users to clear, > but I think it might be worth examining. Care to draft a proposal for > FESCo? We could evaluate it at the same time we do dwmw2/f13's. I'm not totally opposed to the idea, if the dkms system takes care of the logic of building the module when new kernels land and such. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
