On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:36:30 -0500 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There is a difference in having an arbitrary timeout because something > didn't get upstreamed and having a module be orphaned. If the > maintainer is still fighting to get it upstream and it hasn't happened > yet, I see no reason to arbitrarily tell them "too bad, you didn't > meet the timeout." Well, I didn't want the timeout to be a flat "sod off", I wanted it to be another review point. If they're still fighting and there is progress, no reason not to extend it for another release. IF they've sat on their duff and done nothing, well... -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
