Paul Wouters wrote: > On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> I thought RHEL made some effort to avoid breaking the 3rd party modules that >> their customers rely on with every kernel update (and that's probably a very >> large reason they have customers...) while Linus and fedora refuse to provide >> a stable interface. >> >>> One "bright" idea was >>> to let Fedora come up with a way to make it better. >> You mean - like actually define an interface and stick to it at least through >> a kernel major revision number? > > Hear hear! Being able to do: > > #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,22) > > and having that work properly on both Linus and RedHat kernels would be > a huge win. Right now for openswan, these are all off-by-one for > RedHat kernels. We actually fixed that just a few weeks ago in rawhide, and carried the changes back to the 2.6.22.1 kernels in FC6 and F7. -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
