Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:57:46 +0200 > Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> As kmods are on the way out in >> general in Fedora (which is something I in parts agree with) it's even >> more unlikely now. > > kmods as separate packages is what's hopefully on the way out. Out of > tree modules can still be included in the main kernel rpm. It makes > things tramendously easier to keep them in the kernel tree so that they > are built right along with the kernel. It's easier on the end user's > system too as they always get a kernel with the module they need. Only thing is DaveJ sorta kinda said no thanks to carrying any additional out-of-tree stuff in the kernel package. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-kernel-list/2007-August/msg00011.html > And now the kernel maintainers would be the deciders as to what goes in > our out of our kernel, so the same criteria that is used for the kernel > is now used for kernel modules which is completely fair (everybody > plays by the same rules) See above... :) -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
