On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 15:57 -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > I noticed that "dhcpv6 license correction" is a correction noting that > dhcpv6 was labeled as GPL but it is really BSD. > > Is it really necessary to advertise a license change from more > restrictive to less restrictive license? > > GPL -> BSD will never cause a new conflict right? If I had a patch that copied GPL code into it, then yes I'd like to be notified of it no longer being gpl, since that does have implications... (fwiw I dont have such a patch) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
