Re: RPM roadmapping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On 8/2/07, Ralf Ertzinger <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi.

On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:53:43 +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:

The main problem with using cpio is that individual files have a limit
of 2GB (which isn't a problem in most cases, but it is a limit).  Why
not push a newer cpio format that changes all 16-bit and 32-bit
records to 64-bit (along with specifying endienness)?
What exactly is the use case of files larger than 2GB wrt RPM?

I just do not see the need for this.


Seems like computer history has taught us that this is a bad reason to
not extend something.

Exactly! Did you ever wonder what unix would have been like if it only supported the operations where Ken Thompson had been given a use case?

"Rule of Extensibility: Design for the future, because it will be here sooner than you think"

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux