Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, dragoran wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
Not everybody is on rpm-maint list and we'd like to hear the wishes
of (Fedora) developers/packagers too. So: what have you always
wanted to do with rpm, but wasn't able to? Or the other way around:
what you always wished rpm would do for you? What always annoyed you
out of your mind?
arch requires and provides ... to end the endless multilib
discussions ;)
should be automatic until the packager say Requires: foo.arch
I wish it was that simple...
Sure, being able to say "Requires: foo.arch = version-release" would
help in many cases, but it does not *solve* the multilib problems.
A big offender here is the x86 architecture with i386, i486 ... etc
subarchitectures. While most packages are i386 there, the assumed
what about being able to say foo.i?86
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
