Robert Scheck wrote:
Evening,
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Panu Matilainen wrote:
the best way to make rpm reliable and consistent is to strip out all
things that are unnecessary.
hm. Looking forward to pyrpm and pyyum or however it is called, is it
necessary to keep rpm and yum at all? Neither pyrpm nor the pyyum depend on
rpmlib somehow. Isn't it overkill to have two implementations of the same?
Pyrpm is described as "PyRPM is an experimental project to look at rpm
package management". It is a prototyping tool. Not a implementation
meant to be used by users currently unlike Yum (which I think is what
you are referring to as pyyum).
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
