On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:40:40 +0300 (EEST) Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The more specific you can be, the better - "make it not suck" isn't > productive. Of course there's no way everything can be done, we want > the next major release out before end of the decade... Also this is > not a voting where most votes guarantee implementation, but consider > it your chance to be heard. I'm listening... :) Please allow ExcludeArch and ExclusiveArch to propagate into noarch rpms. We have a multitude of noarch rpms (like python scripts and such) that just plain won't work on some arches, but are themselves not binary. We have ExcludeArch and ExclusiveArch in the spec file to prevent them from being built in an arch where their BR or R wouldn't be met, and we have compose tools that scrape this information out of srpms at compose time, as the noarch rpm doesn't have this information. If it were in the rpm itself it would be much easier for compose tools to deal with. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
