On 28 Jul 2007 23:26:18 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> "DP" == Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > DP> My proposal is to implement this where it belongs (in rpmbuild), > > I can't disagree with that. > > DP> and issue warnings (and ignore) any attempt to set the build root > DP> or to rm -rf it from within the spec. > > I must disagree with that; these statements will be required for > compatibility with old versions of RPM (see EPEL4) for many years to > come. I don't particularly want to fork a different version of my > specfiles when there's no need. What is the difference between ignoring it and doing it by default in rpmbuild and what happens now? -- Fedora Core 6 and proud -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
