On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 21:31 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > * Version control the meta-information [...] > Ah, something fresh for a change :) Most of the things that have come up > in this thread, well lets just say I'd been very surprised if they hadn't > come up. Great, since I got no reaction to this idea, I thought maybe I was out to lunch :) Apart from being fresh, do you think it's worth it? Would you consider it for inclusion? Do you think it would be hard to do? > I've been thinking of somewhat different use case, but one of my plans is > to indeed make information about the current transaction available to > (lua-)scripts. I already have written beginnings of lua-rpm bindings, once > that's in usable shape and integrated, scripts could look at current > transaction member packages, their files etc and do decisions based on > that info. I'd be interested in seeing the interface when you have it available. If it could support the features I proposed, I'd still be happy (even though I really think they should be base features in rpm(1) instead of extension scripts, so that people can rely on them everywhere). -- Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx> Lattica, Inc. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
