On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 12:10 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 11:35 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > Also - it lets us work with the portion of the market who run servers > > and like the idea of a daemon they can query for pkg information, but > > don't run dbus. > > > > We turned dbus off everywhere we could - it just used ram and didn't do > > anything for me running a webserver. > > Moving forward, it makes a lot of sense to me to do development on the > OS assuming that we have a sane way for system components to communicate > with one another. > > dbus-daemon doesn't even show up on the radar for RAM usage on my > system... as a sysadmin I will say this: 1. if it ain't necessary it is off 2. if nothing deps on it, it gets removed. - now things depend on dbus these days, and that's fine - but on a server with a static ip- even served via dhcp we don't need it - it's just one more thing that can go wrong. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
