On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 10:33 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 09:29 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 15:40 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > >> Not everybody is on rpm-maint list and we'd like to hear the wishes of > > >> (Fedora) developers/packagers too. So: what have you always wanted to do > > >> with rpm, but wasn't able to? Or the other way around: what you always > > >> wished rpm would do for you? What always annoyed you out of your mind? > > > > > > A working %posttrans or equivalent. > > > > %posttrans works now afaik. Is there something you want that isn't there > > now? > > %posttrans is really a bit of a short-term fix and fundamentally not > changing anything. We need to get to where we're doing a lot of small > transactions rather than one so that things like power failures aren't > catastrophic. At which point, the value of %posttrans over %post starts > to become far far lower. The other approach for handling the power failure problem is the Stateless cached client: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StatelessLinuxCachedClient -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
