Le Mer 25 juillet 2007 17:20, Horst H. von Brand a écrit : > Chuck Anderson <cra@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] > >> Additionally, if the -devel packages were split on license >> boundaries, >> then perhaps the buildsystem could flag attempts to link to >> incompatibly-licensed libararies. > > This is worse than I feared the fabled GPLv3 fallout could be... Don't be ridiculous, we're addressing this now because some people have decided to make GPLv3 an issue, but licence tagging and checking is a longstanding problem which was going to bite us sooner or later once Fedora expanded from a small well-known core to a huge package collection. Some software pools have standardised on a single well-understood licence. Many haven't and this was true before the GPLv3 endeavour was announced. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
