Michael Schwendt wrote, at 07/26/2007 07:21 AM +9:00:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:16:24 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
This in Rawhide looks suspicious:
brutus-keyring-devel provides libBrutusKeyringd-1.0.so.1
evolution-brutus provides libBrutusKeyringd-1.0.so.1
required by: brutus-keyring - 0.9.0-5.fc8.i386
required by: evolution-brutus - 1.1.26.2-2.fc7.i386
required by: evolution-brutus-devel - 1.1.26.2-2.fc7.i386
required by: brutus-keyring - 0.9.0-5.fc8.i386
required by: brutus-keyring-devel - 0.9.0-5.fc8.i386
required by: evolution-brutus-devel - 1.1.26.2-2.fc7.i386
brutus-keyring-devel - 0.9.0-5.fc8.i386
File conflict with: evolution-brutus - 1.1.26.2-2.fc7.i386
/usr/lib/libBrutusKeyringd-1.0.so.1.0.0
File conflict with: evolution-brutus-devel - 1.1.26.2-2.fc7.i386
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libBrutusKeyringd-1.0.pc
evolution-brutus - 1.1.26.2-2.fc7.i386
File conflict with: brutus-keyring-devel - 0.9.0-5.fc8.i386
/usr/lib/libBrutusKeyringd-1.0.so.1.0.0
evolution-brutus-devel - 1.1.26.2-2.fc7.i386
File conflict with: brutus-keyring-devel - 0.9.0-5.fc8.i386
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libBrutusKeyringd-1.0.pc
Which package to file this about?
File against evolution-brutus. evolution-brutus must be upgraded
to >=1.1.28.
[tasaka1@localhost i386]$ rpm -qp --conflicts brutus-keyring-0.9.0-5.fc8.i386.rpm
evolution-brutus < 1.1.28
Mamoru
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
