On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 14:55 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le Mer 25 juillet 2007 14:43, Simo Sorce a écrit : > > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 13:26 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > >> In addition -- in some cases like the quoted one for samba it > >> *might* be > >> the easiest and cleanest solution for everyone to just put the libs > >> with > >> a different license into a different (sub)package. > > > > While it may be the case, the decision should absolutely not be > > dictated > > by the license. > > I respectfuly disagree - for every project that uses a mix of licenses > the licensing split is motivated either by different code origin or by > a careful reflexion on what part can be re-used in what context. In > both cases bundling everything in a single package or subackage is not > doing anyone any favour. I believe packaging splits should be done based on the functionality they provide. As long as licenses are compatible I don't see why you should package stuff based on the component license. Simo. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
