Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:48:53 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote
>
>> Perhaps you're seeing an issue w/a bad mirror?
>
> No, the size mystery has cleared up.
> yum --upgrade shows me this:
>
> Dependencies Resolved
>
> =============================================================================
> Package Arch Version Repository Size
> =============================================================================
> Installing:
> kernel-PAE i686 2.6.23-0.44.rc0.git16.fc8 development 17 M
> kernel-PAE-devel i686 2.6.23-0.44.rc0.git16.fc8 development 4.6 M
> Removing:
> kernel-PAE i686 2.6.23-0.30.rc0.git6.fc8 installed 48 M
> kernel-PAE i686 2.6.22-8.fc8 installed 47 M
> kernel-PAE i686 2.6.23-0.35.rc0.git6.fc8 installed 48 M
> kernel-PAE-devel i686 2.6.23-0.35.rc0.git6.fc8 installed 15 M
> kernel-PAE-devel i686 2.6.23-0.30.rc0.git6.fc8 installed 15 M
> kernel-PAE-devel i686 2.6.22-8.fc8 installed 15 M
>
>
> The "Size" for the installed (to be removed) packages is the actual on
> disk size of the package (as displayed by --qf "%{SIZE}\n").
> The "Size" for the packages to be installed is the file size.
Ah, that size mismatch. Yeah, that's normal. :)
> Still does not explain why the other kernels have to go, though.
What Jesse said and/or the yum changelog and/or Seth says.
--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
