Re: Fwd: Re: film at 11: kernel update breaks udev.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard Hughes schrieb:
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 00:55 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
Argh.  So why _are_ we doing our own special rules instead
of using the upstream ones ?  This isn't the only time I've
run into something like this with udev.

Our udev is about 100x times slower than upstream...

Richard.



What makes you think so?

Is the udevd binary slower?

Is selinux making it slower?

Are the default rules in
/etc/udev/rules.d/05-udev-early.rules
/etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules
/etc/udev/rules.d/95-pam-console.rules
slow?

What is upstream? udev-113/etc/udev/redhat or udev-113/etc/udev/suse ????

Don't troll here!!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux