Hi guys, On 7/21/07, Christopher Stone <chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 7/21/07, Naheem Zaffar <naheemzaffar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You will have to work on a case by case basis, filing bugs where needed. > > Some applications would only be sane in a specific environment. As an > example, Gnome should have a link to Nautilus for file management, KDE > to Konqueror (or whatever they have got in KDE 4. Dolphin?). I do not understand this logic. Why do we assume GNOME users will only use Nautilus, and KDE users will only use Konqueror? Is is so much a stretch of the imagination to think that a KDE user might actually want to run Nautilus (or vice versa)?
I think the adopted approach is better. If I am in Gnome, launching Konqueror will run several KDE dependencies (like ARTS maybe? can't remember what exactly) and they will stay running last time I checked. If I were not a power user, I would rather be shielded from that situation and enjoy better performance. If I were a power user, I would disable showonlyin as needed. Tarek
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
