Dnia 2007-07-21, o godz. 00:17:57 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > Not really. Rsyslog might switch a new format in the future. Look in the > upstream list archives for details. Are they willing to forcibly break compatibility with previous versions? Aren't they going to provide a nice path of upgrade (a converter, accepting both formats)? Is it going to happen before F8? If all three answers are "no", then I don't see any reason to rename syslog.conf. If any of the first two answers is "yes", many of us won't see any reason to really obsolete sysklogd with rsyslog instead of syslog-ng or anything other. Lam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
