On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:14 -0700, David Lutterkort wrote: > On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:14 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 04:06:27PM +0200, Peter Vrabec wrote: > > > Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 12:20:13PM +0200, Peter Vrabec wrote: > > > >> sysklogd config files syslog.conf, sysconfig/syslog are renamed to > > > >> rsyslog.conf, sysconfig/rsyslog and used by rsyslog. logrotate.d/syslog > > > >> is replaced. > > > > > > > > Hey, uh, doesn't changing to using rsyslog.conf remove the major advantage > > > > of rsyslog over syslog-ng? > > > Hmmm, It use rsyslog.conf. > > > cp syslog.conf rsyslog.conf is done, because we want to keep and use > > > previous configuration. Or do you want your custom configuration be > > > dropped and replaced by default one? :-) > > > > For rsyslog to be a drop in replacement, it should use the same config > > file named the same in the same location IMO. > > That change also means that anybody who has automated management of > their syslog configuration must modify their scripts to take those > changes into account (and if they run F7 machines at the same time, do > some ugly logic) > > It would be much gentler if rsyslogd would initially use the exact same > files as sysklogd and let users shuffle things around when they are > ready for that transition. > as a zany idea: f8 -> rsyslog is included, does not obsolete sysklogd, will use syslog.conf if it exists. throws up a warning if it is present and sysklogd is installed, too when it runs. f9 -> rsyslog obsoletes sysklogd a transition period is such a crazy thing :) -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
