Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 02:45:11PM +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: >> Why does rsyslogd have to obsolete syslogd? > > That's easy -- because it does. The original syslogd is no longer in > development. > Right, I figured it would be something like syslogd being discontinued. On the other hand, it's been reasonably quiet for like 6 years. Please don't understand me wrong here, I do get the idea of why Fedora has to replace sysklogd for another package in whatever it releases and maintains. +1 to that. Nonetheless, my stupid question was about why it has to, immediately, explicitly, obsolete sysklogd, leaving "no" choice to continue using sysklogd. Do they conflict if only installed on the same system, in a way that can't be fixed? Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -kanarip -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
