seth vidal wrote: > On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 14:48 +0200, Peter Vrabec wrote: >>> I was looking at the package of rsyslog: why do you apply a patch to >>> rename the daemons from syslogd and klogd to 'rklogd' and 'rsyslogd'? If >>> sysklogd is being replaced by the obsoletes in this package - why name >>> this one differently? >> because package name is rsyslog. The patch will be excluded in next >> release, since it was accepted by upstream. > > Yes, but the upstream makefile creates them as syslogd and klogd. http://rsyslog.cvs.sourceforge.net/rsyslog/rsyslog/Makefile.am?revision=1.10&view=markup > Since > we try to follow upstream as much as possible - what's the reason for > the change in the binary name? > > -sv > > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
