Re: unfiled merge reviews

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:30:52 +1000
Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I am wondering what to do about former Core packages without merge
> reviews.
> 
> I am aware of a number of i18n (input method) related packages
> without merge reviews (anthy, libchewing, m17n-db, and m17n-lib).
> There are surely more in the distro.  Should merge review bugs be
> opened for them?
> 
> One reason for asking is that I would like to build the above
> packages for EPEL EL-4 and presumably the package need to be reviewed
> for that?
> 
> Jens
> 

Are they just missing merge reviews?  Did they have reviews to get into
Core the first time?  A merge review is only necessary if there wasn't
a review to get it into core the first time (I thought...)

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux