On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:58 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > Writing software that just assumes that the killswitch can only ever do > > an all-or-nothing operation is encoding bad policy in our software. > > I disagree. Getting on a plane and switching the kill switch to off, > only to find it's only disabled the bluetooth and not the wlan is a > totally bad design decision in my opinion. Not to mention which, it would make life harder on users working in office areas where transmitters must be demonstrably disabled. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PaulWFrields irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
