That's great and it makes alot of sense, but it wasn't really my original point. My original point was the packaging and toolset for managing and enforcing web proxies and filters leave alot to be desired. Is anyone working on this effort? Is there a current maintainer of squid and squidGuard? Are they actively being improved on/incorporated into the Fedora/GNOME configuration toolset? Thanks, Tim --- Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 18:28 -0700, Timothy Spaulding wrote: > > So I take it that you're in favor of delivering a PC to children to educate them on pr0n? > That's > > extremely radical of you. It seems to me that a minimum configuration that would filter > > inappropriate web sites that was community managed and transparent would be appropriate. Or > am I > > in the minority here? I'm not talking about censorship here but I believe a minimum set of > > community-agreed-upon standards would be acceptable. > > > > My understanding of the situation is that the governments and > institutions to which OLPC machines will be sold are the responsible > party for enforcing such blockings, and not the OLPC project itself. > -- > Peter Gordon (codergeek42) > GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: > DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list ____________________________________________________________________________________ Luggage? GPS? Comic books? Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
