Am Donnerstag, den 12.07.2007, 22:40 +0200 schrieb Tomas Mraz: > I'm still a little bit uneasy to allow this patch in. We were trying to > keep as close to upstream as possible. On the other hand we have other > changes we have other patches in like the SELinux changes for MLS and > the recent support for keys in NSS by which we significantly diverge > from upstream already. So maybe we could reconsider applying the HPN > patch or at least some less controversial parts of it. This paragraph disagrees with your signature. > > But also note that ssh was designed to be primarily a protocol for > interactive shell sessions and thus it has its limitations which mean > that it never can be 100% efficient as protocol for large file transfers > or even establishing VPNs. It seems to me that people which want > extremely fast and secure file transfers should use different solutions > like stunnel. > -- > Tomas Mraz > No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. > Turkish proverb -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
