Could I get some feedback on whether people feel it is appropriate for a
person wanting to get sponsored for packaging to be providing
non-official reviews on any random package ?
Can I just "follow da rulez", pointing out the diversions, so that the
packaging fits Fedora ? [and state that I have no knowledge of the
software being package ?]
Or should I at minimum understand what the particular package /software
/application is actually trying to do ?
Should I only choose potential packages that are written in a language I
have good knowledge of ?
Can a package submitter submit software written by themselves ?
Even if they can't, can't a patch I/someone add to a package do
~anything~ to a users system ?
For software that is open but may be only targeted for a narrow
audience, or that has not had updates for some years, will a package be
automatically rejected ?
Hope I didn't miss the answers to these queries in the packaging
guidelines; if so please point them out.
DaveT.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
