On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 00:59 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Steve G <linux_4ever <at> yahoo.com> writes: > > Not unless upstream takes it. The Fedora merge did not happen so that we > > don't have to work with upstream anymore. We should never think about putting > > a patch in Fedora first and then seeing if upstream takes it. > > Fedora ships and has always shipped plenty of patches. It not being upstream is > definitely an argument against shipping it, but there might be reasons why > shipping it is a net win after all. > > Also, if upstream isn't willing to merge patches, it might even make sense to > fork the project. Please don't use the 'f' word lightly. Forking is the exact opposite goal of Fedora. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
