On Do Juli 12 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Well, IMO, Fedora's purpose should be "stable while following upstream
> without API/ABI breakages of existing packages".
>
> In practice, this means "frequent updates", "adopt early", "fix
> ASAP" ("fixed rawhide" and "fixed upstream" should be banned in Fedora)
> on a "stable foundation (API/ABIs)".
>
> It's one fundamental point rendering Fedora interesting. Another one
> closely related to it is "exposure of user-contributed/developed
> packages".
>
> IMO, users wanting a "security-only updated" distro should probably
> better choose EPEL or an even more "boring" Linux distro.
I agree totally,
regards,
Till
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
