On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 00:58 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 18:31 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > You keep saying this, and I disagree whole-heartedly. My experience > > with sparc tells me this is absolutely not the case. > > I posted the bug numbers to support my observations, and they supported > my qualitative recollection. > > Perhaps it's just that PowerPC is in dramatically better shape than > SPARC, in general. Or maybe you've suffered a lot by being out of sync > with Fedora proper. I'd be interested to see your data and how you've > classified the bugs. Personally, I don't think PowerPC and SPARC are the hard cases. The hard ones will be architectures that glibc doesn't build for. For more than one reason. Still would be good to see Spot's SPARC data though, if he has some. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
