Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/SecondaryArchitectures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/11/2007 01:00 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 July 2007 04:13:53 Oliver Falk wrote:
>> Spot:
>> Well, maybe we should think about the 'subset question'. It might make
>> sense to exclude packages that *would* compile find on a SecArch, but
>> doesn't make sense at all to have it on that arch.
> 
> I think the subset question is more a matter of what you publish as a release.  
> But that isn't the same as what builds for your arch, because while you as 
> the arch maintainer may want to publish one subset, somebody else with a 
> different need may wish to publish a larger or different subset and those 
> packages should be available to them should they wish it.  Just like we do 
> the "Fedora" spin which is a subset of the Everything collection.

Good point Jesse. You're totally right. Forget about the subset question
from my side :-)

-of

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux