On 07/11/2007 01:00 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wednesday 11 July 2007 04:13:53 Oliver Falk wrote: >> Spot: >> Well, maybe we should think about the 'subset question'. It might make >> sense to exclude packages that *would* compile find on a SecArch, but >> doesn't make sense at all to have it on that arch. > > I think the subset question is more a matter of what you publish as a release. > But that isn't the same as what builds for your arch, because while you as > the arch maintainer may want to publish one subset, somebody else with a > different need may wish to publish a larger or different subset and those > packages should be available to them should they wish it. Just like we do > the "Fedora" spin which is a subset of the Everything collection. Good point Jesse. You're totally right. Forget about the subset question from my side :-) -of -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
